Sunday, October 9, 2011

A JOB Well Done: A Legacy to Higher Education



The influence of technology can be felt by nearly all institutions across the country. When thinking about the pioneers who have contributed to the growing relationship between technology and higher education one name rises above the rest, Steve Jobs. Jobs, who died Wednesday, has been credited for introducing devices such as the iPad, iPhone, and iPod to the university setting.


Marc Prensky, in the Chronicle of Higher Education, captures the impact that Jobs has had on higher education. Prensky asks readers to consider if higher education is better because students have music in their ears, rather than in their dorm rooms? Is higher education better because papers are printed out and not hand or typewritten? Is higher education better because students carry tablets with access to libraries and periodicals? Although one may argue that advances in technology carry its fair share of advantages and challenges, it's hard to deny that the way in which students learn has changed forever.


With the creations of the iPad and iPhone Mr. Jobs taught students that technology can be fun, simple, and extremely helpful. Prior to these inventions many individuals, especially those that consider themselves to be technologically challenged, wouldn't dare experiment in the world of technology in fear of causing irreparable damage their papers and computers alike. Currently, it is common to find students and faculty browsing the web for the latest apps that will enhance their education experience. In his article, Prensky states that we have only seen the beginning of Jobs' influence on the college campus. Soon we can expect to see a paperless, bookless campus and an increase in on-line lectures and podcasts. One quick visit to iTunes U and one can have a firsthand glance at these changes taking place.


Not only is Jobs known for his brilliance in the field of technology, he is also known for his dedication to the field of education and desire to help students. Although his products weren't known for being cheap, he was devoted to offering them to students at a discounted rate. As Prensky indicates, Jobs was a master strategist and a strong leader. He proved to students that one person can make a difference on a large scale. He made technology "cool and not geeky" and promoted the idea of teamwork to achieve a common goal.


It never occurred to me just how much my world revolves around technology until the death of Steve Jobs sparked a conversation between a co-worker and I. She asked me "How [my] life would be different without my iPad or iPod?" As I began thinking about her question I realized that my iPod serves as my alarm clock which is set to play my favorite playlist to awaken me. Shortly after waking up I grab my iPad off my nightstand and check the weather, news, and my fantasy football status. I proceed to check my e-mail and calendar in order to validate that I am in sync with my personal, professional, and student responsibilities. Needless to say, both my iPod and iPad occupy my day well before I make it to work or class, which was my original motivation for purchasing both. When I interrupted my thoughts and found myself standing in front of my co-worker, the only answer that came to mind was, "I couldn't begin to imagine!"


Previously I have taken my own gadgets for granted and I fail to pause and realize that my education experience may have been drastically different without individuals like Steve Jobs. This article served as a reminder of how lucky I am to have reached the climax of my pursuit of education while benefiting from all the advances in technology. Prior to Jobs death, I never took the time to appreciate or think about how he helped shape my education. I am excited to see how technology will enhance opportunities for both current and future students.

Internet Addiction

It can impact physical health, grades, and lead to clinical addiction. Removing it can cause withdrawl, you can become dependent on it, and it can actually change your brain. It’s not alcohol – it’s the internet.

College student addiction to the internet (including the use of pornography, gambling, fantasy, and social media) is on the rise. What is our appropriate response? Is it any of our business or responsibility that students may be addiction to the internet?

Studies show that students can’t go 24 hours without the internet, they exhibit co-dependency characteristics, and go through withdrawls without it. Internet can lead to depression and affect physical health (eye strain, insomnia, carpal tunnel, headaches).

Students are likely to deny the affects of internet addiction. They may feel empty, anxious, or depressed when offline (see link).

Students may experience other affects of internet addiction. If internet addiction comes in the form of gambling, students will experience financial affects including financial aid and retention. Students addiction to social media may influence their psychosocial develop including involvement and community development. Student addiction to pornography may lead to sexual addiction and may correlate to improper acting out and sexual deviance .

The internet can also affect academics. Beyond increasing opportunity for plagiarism, the internet is changing the way we think . Scholars from the UK have found that students read differently and think differently than we used to, ‘It is clear that users are not reading online in the traditional sense; indeed there are signs that new forms of “reading” are emerging as users “power browse” horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems that they go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense.

200 students from the University of Maryland were asked to go 24 hours without technology. The image above is a wordle representation of how they felt about the media restriction. This isn’t just an American problem, but a dilemma across cultures.

How should institutions and administrators respond to the internet addiction? What is our legal ability to monitor students’ individual internet use? Can administrators block sites they deem unhealthy to students (gambling, pornography, etc)? Schools may boast that they are wireless or provide nearly constant access to the internet – but is this healthy? One researcher suggests using cognitive behavioral therapy as a solution, perhaps something we could do through health and counseling centers. 84% of college counselors believe this is a real issue, and 93% of them have not received training in how to treat or diagnose it.

We have done a good job responding to alcohol and drug addiction on campus, how will we respond to internet addiction?

*Note: one researcher, using a non-validated instrument, found that internet addiction is on the decline.

Saturday, October 8, 2011

"From bricks & mortar to clicks & mortar" an online/on-demand learning perspective




What will the future classes of higher education look like? Well apparently it looks like some will consist of three formats: face-to-face, online, and hybrid classes. This probably isn’t new news, but I was surprised as to how mainstream the latter two are becoming. For example, at the University of Central Florida (UCF), one of the country’s largest public universities, more than half of the students will take online or blended (all three formats) courses this year. Along the same lines, the University System of Maryland requires undergraduates to take 12 credits of alternative learning, including online. Texas is also planning to do the same. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities plan to have 25% of credits acquired online by 2015.  The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation which includes a $20-million education-technology grant, plans to incorporate blended learning as a basis and is looking at UCF as a model. Objectives for the endeavor is that it will expand access, completion of degrees faster, save money, and manage classroom needs more efficiently. Students who favor online instruction claim that it allows them to have more time for leisure activities. In addition, some say online classes are much easier. Lastly, they assert that they would rather watch a lecture in their residence rather then sit and listen for a two-and-half-hour long lecture in person.  http://chronicle.com/article/Tomorrows-College/125120/

In another article I read, it discussed how effective on-demand video learning is and how it will revolutionize learning and assessment. The main proponent is Salman Khan, director of the Khan Academy. Khan claims the old system of teaching core classes doesn’t work anymore. It’s neither the professors’ or the students’ fault, he blames the system. Khan states that students learning core classes--which are to be the foundation of a student’s understanding--are not taught how to think. Students are passed through assembly lines of learning e.g. lecture, problem set, exam and no intuitive learning is occurring. And at the end of line, most do not retain anything they’ve learned. Khan concludes that the current system allows students to progress with gaps in their knowledge; therefore, students began to “learn to get by through pattern matching and memorizing. They learn to fake understanding, not to think.” 
Khan’s solution to the problem is his organizations’ on-demand video content. It can produce video content to students anywhere anytime. They can rewind, fast-forward, or pause it as much as they wish. Students can focus on material they need to know. Khan says content producers can have data on when a student does a problem and how long it takes. They can provide this information to the student, professor, parent or administrator in real-time. Also available is step-by-step explanations of every problem. Students can redo exercises until they get them all correct. There are applications that will be storehouses of teacher-student generated questions so that both can evaluate the system and improvements can be made on what works and what doesn’t. Khan maintains that this will be more effective and economical for the institution. No more dealing with the multi-billion dollar textbook industry that doesn’t take into account instructor or student feedback. For profits sake, the textbook industry has institutions believing that a new version of a calculus textbook is needed every three to five years when the subject hasn’t changed much since Newton or Leibniz. Khan’s organization has decided to do this as a not-for-profit venture because they do not want learning to conflict with profit maximization. Khan predicts that in ten years from now students can learn at their own pace with appropriate content that will be analyzed to optimize their learning style. Real-time reports will take the place of grading and transcripts so what students know and don’t know can be looked at critically.
By using this new technology the classroom, Khan hopes to transform the classroom into an interactive environment as opposed to a lecture hall filled with passive listeners or daydreamers. The instructor can be a mentor or coach guiding students through the lessons rather than a test writer, lecturer, and grader. Khan is convinced that institutions that will embrace this new system will remain. Others that don’t, it will be their demise. According to Khan, their apps and 2,000 plus on-demand video library, is being used by more than a million students per month. And the number increases significantly every year. The technology is here, it is free, and open to all to utilize. Also interesting is The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Google support Khan’s Academy. With all the support, the technology is improving by the minute. Khan predicts in two years they will have unlimited exercises pertaining to every major math concept through calculus, and they’ll keep going from there. In one of our readings, Arthur Levine stated that we are now an information society that is global and puts a premium on intellectual capital. That capital is knowledge and the people who produce it. Could it be that Salman Khan is one of those people?
In closing, one cannot ignore the fact that online learning is here to stay and getting better. It’s speeding up the whole higher education process. As we should expect it to, I mean, technology by nature makes life easier and faster. Just as businesses adjust to meet the demands of a new generation of customers, maybe its time for higher education to adjust to their new customers. Perhaps the on-demand video content may work for college core classes. Right now it is free and it sounds like it can be tailored to fit a student’s learning style. Students could also save money by not buying expensive core textbooks year after year. On the other hand, upper level and graduate courses involve deeper critical analysis. In my opinion, these courses should remain taught in the classroom with our peers and professor. Only then can a student absorb, process, and implement into practice what he/she has learned.
http://chronicle.com/article/YouTube-U-Beats-YouSnooze/125105

Losing the Whole File Cabinet - Data Loss in the Digital Age of Mobile Devices

After our Saturday class last month my vehicle was broken into and my laptop was stolen. Beyond the feelings of violation and frustration, I had also lost my "mobile office" and potentially all of the data contained therein. Police reports, insurance claims, and conversations with University Risk Management were of secondary concern as my mind raced to determine what student and employee data was on my computer. How much protected data that I was responsible for was out in the world? Was there information on my computer that put me or others at risk for identity theft, fraud, or any number of other headaches? Was there a potential blog entry that could come from this situation? Might as well make lemonade…

In our first weekend of class my group had an animated conversation about online education and the direction higher education seems to be heading. We argued about the value of the classroom/campus experience in terms of student development and the work that we all do. What does student affairs and student engagement look like in an online world? Are we ready as professionals, and as a field, to adapt to and meet his change?

We also chuckled at the fact that most of us had at least 1 (if not more) mobile devices with us in the classroom that connected us to work, family and the internet. Many of us checked our work email and worked on various work-related projects during breaks and over the lunch hour. We live in an ever increasingly digital age, where mobile devices allow us to do almost anything, almost anywhere, at almost any time. Banking, shopping, communicating, and blogging are ever present and accessible. It is only natural that education and the classroom are headed in the same direction. In many ways we are already active participants in this shift in our daily professional lives.

Recent data from the National Center for Education Statistics confirms rapid growth in the percentage of students taking at least on online class since 2000. This trend seem likely to continue and pick up speed as state funding for higher education faces further and deeper cuts. A recent conference sponsored by Academic Partnerships further highlights the crossroads of private enterprise and public education that may be the future for many institutions.

After my laptop was stolen my questions shifted from concern about how we provide student development and engagement opportunities to online learners, to more basic questions of policies and procedure. What does it mean to have private information on mobile devices such as laptops, cellphones, and tablets? How do we truly secure data when we carry the "file cabinet" with us at all times?

It seems that there are weekly news stories of 10,000 records being put at risk here, or 45,000 records being compromised there because of the theft of a laptop or other mobile device. I have several friends who were impacted by a similar theft on my campus several years ago. What do we do to ensure that our policies are keeping pace with our practices? Are we currently providing faculty and staff with the training and tools needed to protect the information on their devices?

I also began to look at all of the policies and procedures in my area that would need to be adjusted and adapted to succeed in an online environment. Code of conduct and wellness programs. Threat assessment and commuter services. My thought process about online education has shifted from philosophical to practical. Online students are here now. I am not sure if our processes are fully ready to serve and support them.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Wikipedia

Wikipedia

The online multilingual encyclopedia Wikipedia was launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Since its onset, it has become the largest and most popular general reference site on the internet with more than 365 million readers in the world. Although many people remain skeptical and critical of the information sources provided by this online encyclopedia, we must consider some of its positive contributions to this era of the information age and new technologies.

Let us take into account for instance, that Wikipedia provides a unique and universal free interactive setting for all peoples of the world. This can be viewed as one the most sociodemocratic technological efforts of our times.

In a recent publication by The Chronicle the international weekly journal of science, Nature , finds that the accuracy of science articles in Wikipedia is comparable to that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Furthermore, Michael Reagle, in his book Good Faith Collaboration published in 2010 explains how a communally created online encyclopedia became the most important reference site in the English language with editions in more than 282 languages. Lessig (2010) argues that Wikipedia “has come to define the very best in an ethic of a different kind of economy or community: at its core, it is a ‘collaborative community.’ He asserts “more than any democracy, it empowers broadly.”

Reagle ( 2010) points out some of the criticisms of the concept of Wikipedia. He notes that its use as a reference may be questionable since everyone, educated or not, can access and edit it. However, he strongly supports this concept since it provides an interactive source of knowledge and information.

In the history of the western world, knowledge has been associated with power, education and social status. Thus, traditionally, only the elites would have access to higher learning and education. Wikipedia changes that paradigm as a platform for shared knowledge, equal participation and dissemination of knowledge. All of its contributions are based on “good faith”. It is about a non- profit, open-source software.

In sum, Wikipedia can be described as one the most revolutionary and democratic technological web-based forums in the 21st century for the dissemination of knowledge.

Mobile is the future of University


Let us think together:                                                                                                
Do you imagine that the future of education has become in your hand?
We touch here one of the educational issues that are significant and are in the need to integrate advanced technologies in communications, and make it useful in educational process, and how to take advantage of what we carry in our hands of cellphones to renew focus on improving the decades-long stagnation in classical education by employing technologies in teaching and learning processes, rather than the disadvantages that mar the use, or limiting use to send and receive particular phone calls.
During this century, the development of the concept of e-learning tools and characterized using the Internet, and looming on the near horizon the potential of investment of public wireless communications technologies in education systems by cell phones.
The tremendous accelerated growth in the technology of mobile devices and wireless technology, and increasing popularity of cell phones, all this helps to discover new methods of  accessibility to these important opportunities in education. E-learning based on this principle: education anywhere and at any time. This is what finally realized with the emergence of learning by cell phones.
1 - What are the reasons and justifications about the need to use a cell phone in education?
2 - What are the benefits of education by cell phone to the parties of the educational process?
3 - What services provided by cell phones, which they can accomplish many of the educational tasks?
4 - What are challenges or difficulties could be faced by using cell phones in education?
Technological devices have become at the moment tools which could hardly depart users on the day or night, and the number of users have increased greatly, especially now cell phone devices are cheap.  Many studies have shown that the cell phone is more technological devices use in our hands, and the most important three things we carry are: keys, wallet and cell phone. After more than 20 years of emergence of cell phones, number of users exceeded more than half of the world.
Perhaps that is what was called Robert Conway, head of the Association of GSM to say that in our contemporary world has become impossible to dispense using mobile phone, and with the launch of the 4G mobile phones in 2010 with speed that up to 100 megabits per second.
Cell phone user can do so much; it enables him to install cameras anywhere and follow-up and controls it through the cell phone, and provides a permanent connection to the Internet. In addition to the services broadcast live satellite TV, efficient and high quality, and conduct calls( video and audio), and data transfer with video at high speeds, also includes service as (video audio) on demand, this service allows user to view multimedia files on demand at any time. Many services that are can be used to provide benefits to all parties in the educational process.  This makes us believe that it is possible to take advantage of cell phones in the process of teaching and learning.
Mobile education, is on the whole a true translation of the philosophy of distance education which is based on expanding educational opportunities for individuals, and lower cost compared with traditional education, and not restricted by time or place or a category of learners, and it is not limited to level or a certain type of education, learner get learn according to his ability and speed of learning, based on his expertise and skills. Success of mobile education is in providing educational service fit with the applicants for such service, and it increases the consolidation of the concept of individual or self-education which contributes in translating the concept of democratic education.
Limited opportunities of learning which currently available or in future of large sectors of society in rural and remote areas, resulting from the unbalanced geographical distribution of higher education institutions, or to certain categories of nontraditional students, such as employees, businessmen, housewives and others who wish to broaden their knowledge and culture and develop their professional skills and get appropriate university degree, but they cannot attend regularly to the campus. All these reasons make mobile education the best solution for them. It can also contribute to overcoming the problems caused by lack of financial resources, especially with high cost of this type of education, and the lack of alternative sources at the present time to meet future needs.
The lecturers do not receive salaries but are paid for every lecture in most cases, in addition mobile education does not need huge budgets to create large buildings and classrooms, which usually requires the allocation of funds for management and maintenance, especially in lower prices and the prices of related services can also be contribute to overcoming the problem of poverty in the university library of modern books and periodicals. Students through participation in the Internet phone service can access databases on the network and communication resources of information, which allows the student and researcher an exceptional opportunity to get millions of various titles, books and recent studies through his cell phone.
The features of mobile education:
Is all the time and everywhere, and allows the learner to communicate rapidly with the information network, it is characterized by easily exchange messages between the learners, and the cost is relatively low, small size makes it easy to portable and its high speed.
Mobile Education requirements:
1 - Availability of necessary infrastructure.
2 - Conversion to a formula that suitable for mobile education.
3 - Providing financial support and appropriate budgets.
4 - Create records for students which contain the necessary information to identify the device and the network that will serve them.
5 - Laying the foundations of trade and financial dealings with the company that operates the network.
The majority of these studies indicated that most mobile devices are useful in teaching and learning by facilitating the tasks of teachers, also learning for students has been such interest in the following:
1 - Broadcast lectures and discussions directly to students regardless of their location.
2   - Students can receive ads or urgent administrative decisions and all information which related to their study.
3 - Enables teachers to review assignments and home works of students, and students can find out teachers evaluation.
4 - helps students and researchers to establish whether a small library of books and lessons, as well as reviews and commentaries, and video clips of a particular area.
5 - Using these techniques ensure greater participation of students in education via mobile devices which they use in their daily lives, and easier to putting a lot of mobile devices in the classroom instead of a desktop PC that require a large area.
6 - implementation of processes and tasks in a group/s(partnerships), so that many of the students and the teacher pass the device between them or use wireless network such as Bluetooth and so teachers can use it to distribute work to students easily and naturally.
7 - The renewal in the traditional method of teaching in particular, this will raise the motivation among the students.
Mobile phones can do multi-task learning services:
1 - SMS
2 - MMS
3 - WAP
4 - MSN
5 - GPRS
6 – Bluetooth
7- G3 / G4  
Technical problems and solutions
The following table shows some problems and solutions could be objected that in mobile education 


Proposed solutions
Problem
1) Using of projector technology, which began to spread with most mobile devices to display this information in the air
2) Using of wireless technologies for the transfer of multimedia files to a computer or television sets.
Small size of the monitors
Virtual Keyboard
Small size keyboards
Use memory cards of up to 4GHz
Small memory capacity
Using modern technologies of charging, such as methanol fuel cell from Toshiba that allows the duration of the work is equal to 60 times the duration of the lithium ion batteries is well known. They are not rechargeable, but can be easily replaced.

The necessity of frequented charging
Ggeneral operating system for mobile devices such as Motion experience Interface (MXI) from RADIX Company
Cannot invest the same personal computer software on mobile devices 
Using the third and fourth generation of wireless communications
There are still difficulties in transferring video files over cellular networks
Solution to this problem is coming naturally with by the gradual increase in the number of users of mobile devices, and this will drive the emergence of new companies and competition between them for the consumer.
Prices remain high so segments of people are not affordable.

The future of mobile education:
E-learning was a ​​long application idea, but it took his place in the education sector. Therefore, mobile education will take its place as a natural role in the education sector, to open the prospects of education for large segments of society. Therefore, mobile is the future of university.